Studies Comparing BPD and BPD-DS


	Studies Comparing BPD and BPD-DS Studies comparing BPD and BPD-DS that show how the BPD-DS procedure performed today has better results with fewer complications. Duodenal Switch Improved Standard Biliopancreatic Diversion: A Retrospective Study. Marceau at al. Jan-Feb 2009 PubMed Abstract BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective study, performed 10 years after surgery, to compare the results between biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) with distal gastrectomy (DG) versus BPD with duodenal switch (DS). METHODS: Complete follow-up data were available for 96% of patients, allowing a comparison of weight loss, revision, side effects, and complications at 10 years. RESULTS: After BPD-DS, weight loss was 25% greater than after BPD-DG (46.8 +/- 21.7 kg versus 37.5 +/- 22 kg, respectively; P <.0001). The need for revision decreased from 18.5% to 2.7% (P <.0001), and the prevalence of vomiting during the previous month was 50% less (23.7-50.6%, P <.0001) after BPD-DS compared with after BPD-DG. Late complications were the same for both procedures. Blood analysis showed that, after BPD-DS, the levels of calcium, iron, and hemoglobin were significantly greater and the parathyroid hormone level was lower than after BPD-DG (71.3 +/- 44.2 versus 103.0 +/- 64.0 ng/L, respectively; P <.0001). CONCLUSION: The DS greatly improved the BPD, as it was initially proposed. The use of the DS increased weight loss, decreased the need for revision, resulted in fewer side effects, and improved the absorption of nutrients. Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch. Marceau et al. Sept 1998 PubMed Abstract Full Article In 1990 Scopinaro's technique of biliopancreatic diversion with distal gastrectomy (DG) and gastroileostomy was modified. A sleeve gastrectomy with duodenal switch (DS) was used instead of the distal gastrectomy; and the length of the common channel was made 100 cm instead of 50 cm. A questionnaire and a prescription for blood work were sent to 252 patients who underwent DG a mean 8.3 years ago (range 6-13 years) and 465 patients who underwent DS 4.1 years ago (range 1.7-6.0 years). The questionnaire response rate was 93%, and laboratory work was completed for 65% of both groups. The mean weight loss after DG was 37 +/- 21 kg and after DS 46 +/- 20 kg. There were fewer side effects after DS: The number of daily stools was lower (p < 0.0002), as was the prevalence of diarrhea (p < 0.01), vomiting (p < 0.001), and bone pain (p < 0.001). Greater benefits related to several aspects of life were reported after DS than DG (p < 0.0001). The mean serum levels of ferritin, calcium, and vitamin A were higher (p < 0.001), and parathyroid hormone was lower. The yearly revision rate for excessive malabsorption was 1.7% per year after DG and 0.1% per year after DS. The two procedures were equally efficient for treating co-morbid conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Biliopancreatic diversion with sleeve gastrectomy/duodenal switch and a 100-cm common limb was shown to produce greater weight loss with fewer side effects. Biliopancreatic Diversion with a New Type of Gastrectomy. Marceau et al. Feb 1993 PubMed Abstract In an attempt to improve the results of biliopancreatic diversion in the treatment of morbid obesity, two aspects of the procedure performed at Laval Hospital were modified to reduce adverse physiological consequences. The distal gastrectomy was replaced by a parietal gastrectomy which preserves vagal continuity along with the lesser curvature, and leaves intact the antro-pyloroduodenal pump. The duodenum was stapled shut and nutrients were diverted through a duodeno-ileal anastomosis. The biliopancreatic diverting intestinal limb was anastomosed to the nutrient ileal limb 100 cm proximal to the ileocaecal valve instead of 50 cm proximal to it, thus doubling the length of the common ileal absorptive segment. Weight loss after either operation was greater than 70% of initial excess weight. Following the new operation, there was a lesser prevalence of side-effects, especially loose stools and malodorous gas, a lesser degree of hypocalcemia and no hypoalbuminemia. The duodenum recanalized at the staple line in 20% of the patients who had the new operation. When data from these patients were excluded, weight loss following the new operation was greater than that seen after the old one. The prevalence of side-effects and the degree of calcium and protein malabsorption remained significantly lower. Weight loss remained satisfactory with a common limb measuring 100 cm. The parietal gastrectomy was not restrictive as shown by the failure to lose further weight when the duodenal stapled diversion failed. Weight loss was thus mainly a function of biliopancreatic diversion, but increased weight loss in the new procedure despite a doubling of the common ileal limb suggests that parietal gastrectomy contributed to weight loss. Because duodenal recanalization can be corrected surgically and now prevented, the modified biliopancreatic bypass is preferred. Now that you know about Studies Comparing BPD and BPD-DS NEXT: More Articles	Enjoy This Site? Use the buttons below, to add us to your favorite bookmarking service:
DS Facts Home Pre-Op FAQ DS Explained Getting DS DS Surgeons Pre-Op to Post-Op Post-Op Life After DS DS Related Info DS Veterans Resources Articles References Support What's New Blog DS Facts Store Site Info About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Subscribe
Copyright © 2008 - 2010 dsfacts.com. All rights reserved. All material on this website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to replace the advice of your doctor.